• April 2017
    M T W T F S S
    « Dec    
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
  • Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.

    Ronald Reagan

    ---

    When the government's boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence.

    Gary Lloyd

    ---

    We have a system that increasingly taxes and subsidizes nonwork.

    Milton Friedman

    ---

    The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money

    Alexis de Tocqueville

    ---

    Those of us who manage the public dollars will be held to account to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day, because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and our government.

    Barack Hussein Obama, 1/20/09

    ---

    My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it.

    Barack Hussein Obama

    ---

    “And the Democrats intend to lead the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history”

    Nancy Pelosi, Election Night 2006

    ---

    A community organizer can't bitch when communities organize.

    Rush Limbaugh

    ---

Our Continued Slide Into Socialism

Ever since FDR initiated his “New Deal”, our country is being converted from a Republic to a Socialist State.  The Democrats (and increasingly the Republicans) realize that there is an ever-increasing portion of society that favors income redistribution, which leads to votes and then re-election.

Is Socialism best for the country? I would argue not.

Our founding fathers took great risks to break off from the tyranny of England, to ultimately form a government based on the primary principle of liberty. But the taxes imposed upon the colonists pale in comparison to what we face today; and it ain’t going to get any better.

Just as happened to the Madoff Ponzi scheme, the government’s Ponzi scheme will eventually crash and burn. Yes, all of the money which is confiscated from our paychecks in the form of FICA taxes is currently funding not only current Soshsecurity (ala Harry Reid) payments, but also is funneled into the general fund, and ends up financing the pork that keeps Congress Critters in the House and Senate.  There is no such thing as a seperate Social Security fund.

I can go on and on, but I think you get the point.

The solution is rather simple, and contains 2 parts:

1. Line item veto power to the POTUS.

2. Term limits for all elected offices, INCLUDING the House and Senate.

The line item veto will allow the POTUS to get rid of needless expenditures that the greedy thiefs slip in, which have absolutely nothing to do with the original bill. Since the purpose of having 3 branches of government is to keep each branch in check,  (for those of you educated in the Publik Skoolz, the three branches are the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial), line item veto is very appropriate.

Term limits will prevent any one person from gaining too much power and influence, which will even the playing field, thus making our government truly representative, rather than having career politicians making decisions based on politics, rather than on what is best for the country.   If term limits are good enough for the President, they certainly should be good enough for the House and Senate.

But I won’t hold my hand on my ass until either of THESE happen…

 

J

What will they do?

Well, here we are. As of January 20, 2009, the Democrats will have a comfortable majority in both chambers of Congress, and they will have an occupant at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. What will they do?

It’s easy to sit around all gloomy and doomy and fret about the coming dictatorship or about the arrival of Marxism to our shores, but let’s be a little realistic here. Given the current economic crisis, there isn’t going to be a whole lot of money to throw around without really tacking a lot more onto the budget defecit and the national debt. The current occupant of the White House has done a bang-up job of making sure that those two items are out of control. Although I’m sure there will be lots of additional spending, I don’t think it will be as bad as some are predicting.

Let’s consider this – now that the Democrats control both the White House and Congress, isn’t one of their primary goals going to be to make sure they stay in control for as long as possible? And aren’t they going to have to be a little judicious in how much money they throw around, lest the American Taxpayers boot them out of office, like we did to congressional Republicans two years ago?

So, what items on their agenda can they implement that would not be a big upfront burden on the taxpayers? Well, I’ve thought quite a bit about that one over the last week, and my primary suspect is the “Employee Free Choice Act”, otherwise known as Union Card Check. Kind of a cute name, don’t you think? “Employee Free Choice Act”. What they should really call it is the “Coerce and Harass Employees into Unionizing Act”.  In case you’re not familiar with this legislation, it would  allow union representatives to organize a group of employees simply by having a majority of said employees sign a card stating their intention to unionize.  In other words, no secret ballots.

So, how would this have a negative impact on the taxpayers?  Well, it wouldn’t, at least not in respect to our role as taxpayers.  It would, however, negatively impact us as consumers.  Let’s say that, come January, this legislation passes, and President Obama signs it.  Now let’s say one of the big unions decide to make a run at unionizing retail service employees.  Let’s say, just as an example, that they choose Wal-Mart employees.  Now let’s say that a majority of Wal-Mart employees exercise their “free choice”, and sign the union cards.  Let’s say the new union can’t come to terms with Wal-Mart, and the case goes before a federal arbitrator.  Let’s say the arbitrator rules in favor of the union.  Now, Wal-Mart employees are unionized.  Now what happens?

The union starts demanding better wages, more break times, better benefits, etc.  How will Wal-Mart respond?  Well, one way would be to raise prices to cover the increased payroll costs.  Another way would be to install more automated self-checkout lanes to cut back on the number of employees needed per store.  The result – higher prices at the retail level and higher unemployment rates.   How wonderful!!

This is one of the most likely things to happen in the next year.  Maybe not Wal-Mart, but Card Check is definitely coming in some form.  In relative terms, considering we have a three-trillion-dollar plus budget and an over ten-trillion-dollar national debt, this won’t be expensive for the government to do, and it will give a BIG payoff to the unions, whose leaders have been so loyal to the Democrats over the years.  Get ready, because here it comes.